Binance Gains Advantage in SEC Case as Judge Dismisses Key Claims

US judge has dismissed several core claims by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in a case against Binance. In a post shared by
the cryptocurrency exchange today (Tuesday), Binance noted that the federal judge had dropped multiple important arguments brought by the SEC,
strengthening the company’s defense in the legal tussle against the watchdog.

Specifically, the court’s decision dismissed the
contention that crypto tokens, including Binance’s native BNB and its
fiat-backed stablecoin BUSD, could be categorized as securities. Judge Amy
Berman Jackson of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
has ruled that these tokens do not meet the criteria for securities, thereby
rejecting the SEC’s broad assertion.

Additionally, the court dismissed the SEC‘s claim that
secondary market sales of BNB tokens on crypto exchanges constituted securities
transactions. Besides that, the court has criticized the SEC’s claims that
crypto tokens are inherently investment contracts.

According to Binance’s statement, the ruling mentioned that the focus should be on the circumstances surrounding each transaction rather than the tokens themselves. In the statement, Binance faulted the regulator for failing to provide sufficient evidence that
secondary market sales of BNB tokens were conducted with an expectation of
profits, a crucial element under the Howey Test for classifying something as a
security.

Regarding its native stablecoin BUSD, the court
reportedly dismissed the claim that Binance’s BUSD is an investment contract.
There was no evidence to suggest that BUSD was marketed with an expectation of
profit due to Binance’s efforts, the exchange added.

Other Claims to Proceed

However, while the court dismissed these claims,
it allowed certain aspects, such as the SEC’s argument on direct sales of BNB
as securities transactions, to proceed. These remaining claims reportedly face
significant hurdles for validation, as the SEC must prove that token purchases
were made with investment expectations.

Binance has vowed to defend itself against the SEC’s
regulatory attempts. The company is reportedly advocating for fair and
consistent oversight that fosters innovation and growth within the crypto
market.

Amid this development, Binance has already restricted certain services to European users to comply with the MiCA regulations. This step occurs as the new cryptocurrency regulations take shape in the region. Some of the affected services include access to copy trading, which the exchange effected on June 26.

US judge has dismissed several core claims by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in a case against Binance. In a post shared by
the cryptocurrency exchange today (Tuesday), Binance noted that the federal judge had dropped multiple important arguments brought by the SEC,
strengthening the company’s defense in the legal tussle against the watchdog.

Specifically, the court’s decision dismissed the
contention that crypto tokens, including Binance’s native BNB and its
fiat-backed stablecoin BUSD, could be categorized as securities. Judge Amy
Berman Jackson of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
has ruled that these tokens do not meet the criteria for securities, thereby
rejecting the SEC’s broad assertion.

Additionally, the court dismissed the SEC‘s claim that
secondary market sales of BNB tokens on crypto exchanges constituted securities
transactions. Besides that, the court has criticized the SEC’s claims that
crypto tokens are inherently investment contracts.

According to Binance’s statement, the ruling mentioned that the focus should be on the circumstances surrounding each transaction rather than the tokens themselves. In the statement, Binance faulted the regulator for failing to provide sufficient evidence that
secondary market sales of BNB tokens were conducted with an expectation of
profits, a crucial element under the Howey Test for classifying something as a
security.

Regarding its native stablecoin BUSD, the court
reportedly dismissed the claim that Binance’s BUSD is an investment contract.
There was no evidence to suggest that BUSD was marketed with an expectation of
profit due to Binance’s efforts, the exchange added.

Other Claims to Proceed

However, while the court dismissed these claims,
it allowed certain aspects, such as the SEC’s argument on direct sales of BNB
as securities transactions, to proceed. These remaining claims reportedly face
significant hurdles for validation, as the SEC must prove that token purchases
were made with investment expectations.

Binance has vowed to defend itself against the SEC’s
regulatory attempts. The company is reportedly advocating for fair and
consistent oversight that fosters innovation and growth within the crypto
market.

Amid this development, Binance has already restricted certain services to European users to comply with the MiCA regulations. This step occurs as the new cryptocurrency regulations take shape in the region. Some of the affected services include access to copy trading, which the exchange effected on June 26.

Source link